Jennifer Sonner
Val Lewton and the Creation of Cat PeopleIn the year 1939 the film studio RKO-Radio Pictures was the “smallest of the majors” (Vieira 121) and was described as “an odd little studio that had barely survived its first ten years” (121). In fact, the studio’s reputation was one that was belittled by other studios, like Paramount and their declaration that “In case of an air raid, go directly to RKO. They haven’t had a hit in years!” Desperate, the studio decided to make several changes, putting Joseph Breen and Charles Koener in charge of RKO in 1942, and it was Breen who decided to hire an “affable” story editor named Val Lewton to breathe some much needed fresh air into the studio’s motion pictures. He would take the job, and could have complete artistic freedom and creative control if he followed certain conditions. These conditions were:
1. He had to produce “Horror Programmers”
2. He had to keep the budget of each film under $150,000.
3. Accepted titles would be arrived at by a system of marketing research
4. Agree to a salary of $250 a week.
Lewton agreed to these conditions,
but later stated that “They may think I am going to do the usual chiller stuff
which’ll make a quick profit, be laughed at, and be forgotten, but I’m going to
fool them . . . I’m going to do the kind of suspense movie I like” (121). Lewton came to RKO believing that the typical
vampire, werewolf, and man-made monster had been over-exploited in the last few
years, but “nobody had done much with cats.”
This, in essence, is how Cat
People came to be.
The title for Cat People came from, according to specific sources, an
over-excited Hollywood party-goer who confronted Lewton and told him to create
a film with the catchy title Cat People.
The name, despite Lewton’s objections that they were “stuck with that
title,” became the basis for Lewton’s film.
This, along with a multitude of other personal inspirations, was the
beginning of what was to become the film Cat
People.
Cat People was
written by Val Lewton and DeWitt Bodeen, the latter writer inspired by a
magazine layout featuring models wearing cat masks. According to Ruth Lewton, Val’s wife, he “dredged
his own Russian Jewish psyche to write the first film” (121). When it came to Russian folk legends, the one
that effected Lewton the most were the ones about cats. He was absolutely frightened by cats. He used this as insight into a film that was
to be anchored on the concepts of horror, though Lewton “tossed away the horror
formula from the beginning” (122).
Lewton did this because he wanted a film that dramatized the psychology
of fear, playing on the thing that all people dread: the unknown.
By using darkness to highlight what may have been lurking in the
shadows, Lewton created a film that used suspense and audience perception to
create the big scares in Cat People.
Another decision that helped create
the suspense-filled picture was Lewton’s friend Jacques Tourneur, a man who “had
a flair for creating shadowy sequences.”
According to Tourneur, they believed in “suggesting horror rather than
showing it” (122). Horror scholars have consented
that “the horror is dependent on the sharply demarcated lines drawn between the
animal kingdom and ourselves. If this boundary were lifted, horror might be
transformed” (Powell 69). What one finds
through Lewton’s film is a new perspective on the concepts of the horror genre,
one that is challenged and questioned by looking to the horror films that came
before Cat People.
Another aspect that defines Val
Lewton’s work on Cat People is the
B-movie qualities of the film. Lewton
often referred to himself as “no artist” but also “Lewton liked to note the
trashiness of his work . . . yet as any viewer of these films knows, trash was
beauty for Lewton” (Nemerov 8). The
beginning of the film (which I will not describe for those who have not seen
it) actually drops a hint to the audiences on Lewton’s beliefs that this work
had an air of disposability to it. This
was another motif that spanned through his collection of films, as Lewton
meditated on the fickle nature of the film industry while also exalting the “trashiness”
of his design. This mocking tone for
film was also a type of motto for the filmmaker, watch Cat People and see if you
can spot his belief that “let no one say, and say it to your shame, that all
was beauty here, until you came” (Nemerov 8).
Audiences seemed to agree with Lewton
and Tourneur, as Cat People became a
sleeper hit for RKO, making more than $3 million on the terror of the unknown.
According to sources, “Cat People saved RKO when it was practically
bankrupt” (Vieira 122) and Lewton went from obscurity to one of RKO’s golden
boys. An interesting note to mention is that the creation of his films ended up
being partly a result of his contractual conditions, where his budget and title
restriction led to both the resulting Cat
People and his new approach to horror in general. Lewton, in only four years, “brought a
singular vision to the screen in nine Gothic thrillers before RKO abandoned him
and his unit” (Dixon 43). Though Lewton
died early in his life and career, at age 46, in a short amount of time Lewton
created a new approach to the horror genre.
In doing so, films like Cat People
and his other RKO pictures are now known as genre-bending additions in the
annals of horror.
Works Cited
Dixon, Winston Wheeler. A
History of Horror. New
Brunswick: Rutgers University Press,
2010. Print.
Nemerov, Alexander. Icons
of Grief: Val Lewton’s Home Front
Pictures. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2005. Print.Powell, Anna. Deleuze and Horror Film. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2005. Print.
Vieira, Mark A. Hollywood Horror: from Gothic to Cosmic. New York: Harry N. Abrams, Inc., 2003. Print.
Two questions for Cat People discussion:
ReplyDeleteTo what extent was the technique of "implication rather than explication" a result of Cat People's tiny budget?
How did the budget positively influence the directorial style?
-PK-
Due to the tiny budget, having monster makeup, transformations and actions was probably out of the question. But I don't know that we would have seen a fabricated monster with a larger budget, it sounded to me like the director wanted to avoid that and do something different.
DeleteAdditional questions for discussion:
ReplyDeleteWould the original Cat People film been far less effective if it had been given a large budget?
How does the original film compare to the more expensive, more explicit 1982 remake of Cat People?
-PK-
From my research, a few ways the budget influenced the directional style came in the form of the "unknown" dread, and as mentioned by Isaac, there were implied sequences of transformation as opposed to it being directly filmed. That's at least one instance where the budget created an actual film "style."
ReplyDeleteI have very vague memories of the 1982 remake of Cat People. Mostly I just remember it being over the top with sex, violence and bad acting. I was bored and gave up watching after the brother made it obvious he and his sister were destined to mate (yuk - too far for me) lol. I liked the original because of the fact that you didn't see much and it kept the anticipation going; along with the intrigue. I like movies with action and CG, but some of the best movies/stories are told without all the extra flash; they don't need it.
ReplyDelete